Fans Forgot All About The Time A Band Sued Avril Lavigne For 'Girlfriend'
The details of that one time a band sued Avril Lavigne have apparently been forgotten by her older fans. In a time-warp twist, the more youthful TikTok technology was "shocked" to determine that Avril had defended herself in opposition to a lawsuit that alleged she plagiarized any other staff's music.
It's true that another band took issue with one among Avril's hit songs throughout the artist's unique rise to reputation. So what in point of fact happened, and how did it all end?
Avril Lavigne's Song 'Girlfriend' Was Catchy...
Fans understand that Avril Lavigne's music 'Girlfriend' had a super catchy hook and were given caught in their brains again in 2007. In fact, it's so catchy that it's most probably making a comeback in most fans' brains at this very moment.
But the problem was once that the track, whilst catchy, did not appear all that authentic, no less than to not one staff that heard it. The band The Rubinoos filed a lawsuit towards Avril (and her document company) in line with an accusation that their 1979 monitor was once the foundation for her lyrics.
The track, titled 'I Wanna Be Your Boyfriend,' no doubt had a different sound than Lavigne's -- more of a classic pop sound than a grunge-pop one. But there are lyrical similarities, as someone comparing the content of the songs can see.
For instance, The Rubinoos' monitor comprises the lyric "Hey (hey) you (you) I wanna be your boyfriend gonna make you love me..." Avril's song, after all, contains "Hey, hey, you, you
I want to be your girlfriend, No way, no way, hey, hey..."
But is that sufficient to say that Avril Lavigne plagiarized the crew's music? They thought so, however any person else did not.
An Expert Musicologist Heard No Similarities
As this was back in the early days of social media, Avril Lavigne took to Myspace, as one did in the ones instances, to state that she'd never heard of the established band's music. But her supervisor went a step further, it sounds as if hiring a "musicologist" to compare the two songs.
The Starreported that the musicologist "found no similarities between the songs." Later, a "settlement was reached," although Avril's prison representation previous stated they might imagine settling the go well with just to avoid a "costly legal battle."
That didn't appear to be important, though; whatever quantity the two events settled on was once sufficient that The Rubinoos' contributors who introduced the lawsuit later said that they "completely exonerate[d]" Avril and her workforce from any wrongdoing.
Translation? They most definitely won some money from the entire thing so that it will pass away quietly. But to Avril's credit score, a minimum of her group didn't have to pay ongoing royalties to the crew, as has came about to different artists. And Avril's net worth didn't seem to take a hit, either.
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7tbTErZ%2Bippeoe6S7zGiZmqaUYsC2scNmmK%2BqmaF6ra3Vop6nnV2ctrO4xaugnqaUZA%3D%3D